Comments on: Methods of Managing SQL Server Partitions http://michaeljswart.com/?p=45 Database Whisperer Mon, 06 Sep 2010 00:56:15 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1 By: Michael J. Swart http://michaeljswart.com/?p=45&cpage=1#comment-112 Michael J. Swart Wed, 08 Apr 2009 15:25:00 +0000 http://michaeljswart.com/?p=45#comment-112 Thanks Michelle,<br/><br/>I missed those features. It makes sense that partitioned tables should play nicely with replicated tables. Both features are ones which that help DBAs make their systems highly scalable. <br/><br/>Michael Thanks Michelle,

I missed those features. It makes sense that partitioned tables should play nicely with replicated tables. Both features are ones which that help DBAs make their systems highly scalable.

Michael

]]> By: Michelle Ufford http://michaeljswart.com/?p=45&cpage=1#comment-111 Michelle Ufford Wed, 08 Apr 2009 14:53:00 +0000 http://michaeljswart.com/?p=45#comment-111 Hi Michael,<br/><br/>There's also a couple of other partitioning features in 2008 that I'm really excited about. For example, they've improved parallelism for querying partitioned tables. They've also given us the ability to swap out partitions on replicated tables, which was missing in 2005. <br/><br/>Nice article! :)<br/><br/>Regards,<br/><br/>Michelle Hi Michael,

There’s also a couple of other partitioning features in 2008 that I’m really excited about. For example, they’ve improved parallelism for querying partitioned tables. They’ve also given us the ability to swap out partitions on replicated tables, which was missing in 2005.

Nice article! :)

Regards,

Michelle

]]>